TALK & OPINIONS BY SILVIO CANTO JR.

We discuss politics, sports and a few extras!

Remember when personal conduct did not affect your job?

leave a comment »

bill-oreilly-fox1

Back in 1998-99, many Democrats and liberals defended President Clinton.   My favorite defense was that President Clinton’s private behavior did not affect his job, i.e. “look at your 401-K!” and the unemployment rate was something I heard about on TV back then!

I find this interesting because Bill O’Reilly’s alleged personal conduct did not affect his job either.   After all, his ratings never dropped.  

This is why I’ve grown so skeptical of any public figure accused of sexual harassment, specially when we hear about them on The New York Times.

Back in the summer of 1998, when many of us were caught up in the McGwire-Sosa home run chase, this is how some women of the left reacted to the allegations against President Clinton.  

This is how the late Marjorie Williams explained it back then:   

 

Their excuses range from the procedural stonewall (“What is important for the American people to know is that there is a process in place to deal with these allegations,” in the words of Senator Barbara Boxer) to the creative inversion (What about Ken Starr’s “humiliation” of the women he dragged before the grand jury?, fumed Representative Nancy Pelosi) to the truly fanciful twist on gender politics (“Not so many years ago, a woman couldn’t be a White House intern,” said a straight-faced Senator Carol Moseley-Braun on Meet the Press).

As Miss Williams wrote further on:    

The chief reason for feminists’ continued support of Clinton is clear: Clinton is their guy. Clarence Thomas was their enemy. Bob Packwood, a liberal Republican who was the next habitual boor to walk the plank, was a harder case for feminists, but in the end they tied the blindfold. Clinton, though, is the hardest case, because he is the most reliably supportive president they’ve ever had.

It wasn’t long ago that we made excuses for men who engaged in bad behavior.   

Why is Mr. O’Reilly different?   Could it be his pro-life position?   or his support of traditional marriage?  or the War on Christmas?

Put me down as a total skeptic.

P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/04/remember_when_personal_conduct_did_not_affect_your_job.html#ixzz4fAOWL1sp
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Advertisements

Written by scantojr

April 24, 2017 at 6:51 am

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: