We discuss politics, sports and a few extras!

Archive for January 31st, 2017

The Supreme Court and other thoughts with George Rodriguez

leave a comment »

Guest: George Rodriguez, South Texas conservative……..We will look at the Supreme Court nomination…..Trump Cabinet and the US Senate………..the furor over the executive order………the Democrats imploding…..and other stories…

Click to listen:

Source: The Supreme Court and other thoughts with George Rodriguez 01/31 by Silvio Canto Jr | News Podcasts

Written by scantojr

January 31, 2017 at 11:00 pm

A word about Ernie Banks (1931-2015)

leave a comment »



In my days in Wisconsin, we used to walk home from school. One afternoon, I was by myself and saw this elderly couple listening to the radio, a ball game on the radio.

I asked: “Who is playing”

The lady said: “The Cubs of course”

I saw the box score the next day and saw that a fellow named Banks played first.

A few years later, that fellow Banks hit # 500 against the Braves.

We were saddened to hear that Ernie Banks died at age 83.

My guess is that most people don’t know much about his younger days in Dallas, Texas:

“Banks was known universally as “Mr. Cub.”

His mantra “Let’s play two,” referred to his desire to play two games daily for a team that too often struggled to compete.

But Banks’ roots were in Dallas where he was raised on Fairmount Street in what was then known as North Dallas. Today, the downtown Arts District stands in what had been his old neighborhood.

The neighborhood was part of a segregated city back then. Banks was one of 12 children born to Eddie and Essie Banks. He attended nearby Booker T. Washington High School where he was a wide receiver on the football team and played on the softball team. The school did not have a baseball team.

While growing up, he spent many a summer day catching pre-dawn rides on the back of flatbed trucks heading north to the sleepy town of Frisco, where he would earn $1.75 a day picking cotton.

After his 10-game season with the Cubs in 1953, Banks returned to live with his family at 1723 Fairmount Street. To help make ends meet, he landed a job as a bellman at the ritzy Adolphus Hotel, less than a one-mile walk from home.

“Our North Dallas was a great place to grow up,” Banks said in a 2013 interview with The Dallas Morning News in advance of his Presidential honor.

Banks was guided to baseball by a neighbor, William Blair, who played in the old Negro Leagues. Blair, who had watched in awe as Banks pounded softballs over the outfield wall at Booker T., first added him to a barnstorming team he managed. Then Blair steered him to the Negro Leagues’ famed Kansas City Monarchs.

After two years in the Army, it was on to Chicago.

“Not many people know I am from Dallas,” Banks said in the 2013 interview. “I used to get back there some, but I haven’t been there recently…”

Banks said then the last time he had been in Dallas for any extended time was in 2009 when his mother Essie died. “Unfortunately, I only seem to get there now for funerals,” he said.

Blair, who founded the Elite News, a newspaper that served Dallas’ African-American community and worked there for more than five decades, was the driving force behind the establishment of Dallas’ Martin Luther King Jr. People’s Parade.

He hoped to someday organize at least one parade in honor of Ernie Banks.
Blair died in April at age 92.

Asked in 2013 if he might like a parade in his hometown, Banks responded gleefully.

“Absolutely, absolutely,” he said. “I’d be glad to come home.””

Ernie Banks never got “to come home”.

Over the years, I’ve seen some great players in person and TV. Sadly, I never got to see Ernie Banks in person but do recall hearing #500 on WGN radio.

Banks was a great player. Better than that, he was a great human being.

We will miss Ernie Banks for a long time.

P.S.  You can hear my show  CantoTalk  or  follow me on Twitter  

Written by scantojr

January 31, 2017 at 1:00 pm

Posted in Baseball Hall of Fame

Tagged with

Roe v. Wade will raise its ugly head again this week

leave a comment »


This week, President Trump will announce a Supreme Court nomination. Based on news reports, he will pick from a list of extremely competent people. In other words, any of these men or women would have easily been approved years ago. Some would have likely been approved on a voice vote, as was the case with two of President Eisenhower’s nominations.

That was then and this is now. Welcome to politics since Roe v. Wade.

Back in 2005, David Brooks commented on the Samuel Alito hearings, the first of two of President George W. Bush’s nominations:   

Justice Harry Blackmun did more inadvertent damage to our democracy than any other 20th-century American. When he and his Supreme Court colleagues issued the Roe v. Wade decision, they set off a cycle of political viciousness and counter-viciousness that has poisoned public life ever since, and now threatens to destroy the Senate as we know it.

When Blackmun wrote the Roe decision, it took the abortion issue out of the legislatures and put it into the courts. If it had remained in the legislatures, we would have seen a series of state-by-state compromises reflecting the views of the centrist majority that’s always existed on this issue. These legislative compromises wouldn’t have pleased everyone, but would have been regarded as legitimate.


Instead, Blackmun and his concurring colleagues invented a right to abortion, and imposed a solution more extreme than the policies of just about any other comparable nation.

Religious conservatives became alienated from their own government, feeling that their democratic rights had been usurped by robed elitists. Liberals lost touch with working-class Americans because they never had to have a conversation about values with those voters; they could just rely on the courts to impose their views. The parties polarized as they each became dominated by absolutist activists.

Unable to lobby for their pro-life or pro-choice views in normal ways, abortion activists focused their attention on judicial nominations. Dozens of groups on the right and left have been created to destroy nominees who might oppose their side of the fight. But abortion is never the explicit subject of these confirmation battles. Instead, the groups try to find some other pretext to destroy their foes.

And destroy your foes is exactly what we will see starting this week.

The Democrats are so invested in defending Roe v. Wade that every question will be about it. They will ask in hundred of ways about whether or not the nominee plans to overturn “settled law”.    

Sorry, but the 1973 decision was an opinion not a law. We want to put abortion to the test of the law. We are the ones who would love to see a debate in legislatures from coast to coast on abortion and same sex marriage. Roe v. Wade killed any chance of the people crafting a law or compromise.

So get ready for the ugliest side of our politics, or another debate about abortion.

P.S. You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.

Read more:
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

Written by scantojr

January 31, 2017 at 6:26 am